The Forest Rights Act of 2006 was widely hailed as a landmark legislation, one that sought to empower some of India’s most disenfranchised communities– the Adivasis. Ten years later, only 3 percent of forest dwellers have their rights recognised, and the Act itself is increasingly being undermined by the present government. Here’s a closer look.
Ten years of FRA: only 3 per cent of forest dwellers’ rights recognised
Ten years after the historic Forest Rights Act (FRA) was passed by the Indian lawmakers, only three per cent of villages or communities could secure their rights over forest resources which include land and the produce from the forests and water, states the Citizens’ Report prepared by Community Forest Rights – Learning and Advocacy, a network of organisations working on securing rights for the forest dwellers in the country. The report reveals that some of the states with a significant percentage of forest-dwelling tribes and communities have performed poorly in implementing these rights.
During a two-day seminar held in New Delhi, the members of forest-dwelling communities and environmental activists presented region and state-specific progress in implementation of the Act, passed during the tenure of the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance on December 18. 2006. Officially known as the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006, the legislation recognised the historical injustice meted out to Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers by helping such communities secure their traditional rights over the forest land and community forest resources.
While hailing the FRA, community representatives, environmental activists and experts said that the pace of the implementation of this act is hindering the growth in these societies. “In addition to moral reasons for implementing the Act, it has the potential to conserve forests and biodiversity, improve local livelihoods and help meet India’s international commitments to sustainable development and climate change mitigation,” said Neema Pathak Broome, one of the authors of the citizens’ report and a researcher with Kalpavriksh, a non-profit working on the forest livelihood and ecology. “Unfortunately, due to a lack of political will and intentional efforts to undermine the law, this vast potential for democratic forest governance remains unrealised,” she added.
Lack of political will
Incidentally, a member of the newly constituted NITI Aayog, a planning body, recognised that there was a lack of political will to implement the act. “The Act is a sound piece of legislation. However, due to the bottlenecks posed by various departments of the government, it has not been implemented so far. We are trying to assess these bottlenecks and find the best way out,” said T. Haque, Chairperson of Land Policy Cell, NITI Aayog
Titled ‘Promise and Performance – Ten Years of the Forest Rights Act’, the objective as explained by lead researcher Tushar Dash is to highlight the potential of the FRA, assess its achievements, identify the bottlenecks and find the ways forward. “We have not only made a quantitative estimate of forest land that has the potential to be recognised as Community Forest Right and compare it to the actual forest area as CFRs across the country but also assess the qualitative potential of FRA for gender-equal development, poverty alleviation, climate change and biodiversity conservation,” said Dash, who is the lead campaigner for Odisha based non-profit, Vasundhara.
Speaking on the benefits that Community Forest Rights have brought to tribal areas, community leader of Mendha Lekha village in Gadhchiroli district of Maharashtra, Mohan Hirabhai Hiralal said that the rights have brought prosperity to the village. “Through the FRA, Gram Sabhas in Gadchiroli district have asserted their rights to harvest bamboo and tendu leaves. In Mendha Lekha village, the community has generated over Rs 1- crore turnover from the harvesting of bamboo in CFR areas, which has allowed us to give higher wages to workers. We are now developing management plans to conserve and sustainably use our forests,” he said.
According to the findings of the report, minimum estimated potential of forest area over which CFR can be recognised in India (excluding five north-eastern states and Jammu & Kashmir) is approximately 85.6 million acres (34.6 million hectares) which translates to more than 200 million Scheduled tribes and other forest dwellers in over 170,000 villages getting their rights.
Ten Years after the Forest Rights Act
Under the UPA -2 government many efforts were made to dilute the implementation of the Act. The rate of arbitrary rejections of claims was high and in particular the registration of community rights had a very poor registration. Under the Modi government the offensive against the Act has increased manifold. Firstly it has brought a series of legislations that undermine the rights and protections given to tribals in the FRA, including the condition of “free informed consent” from gram sabhas for any government plans to remove tribals from the forests and for the resettlement or rehabilitation package. The laws were pushed through by the Modi government without any consultation with tribal communities. They include the amendments to the Mines and Minerals Regulation Act, the Compensatory Afforestation Act and a host of amendments to the Rules to the FRA which undermine it.
Ten years of the Forest Rights Act: Opportunity lost?
Sharmistha Bose, Oxfam India
With no resource allocation to back the implementation of FRA and a weak Ministry of Tribal Affairs, which is severely understaffed, the pattern percolates to the state level where officials still lack knowledge of the provisions of the Act. In most states the claiming process is challenging — forest rights committees are still not constituted at the hamlet levels; there is no support to communities to fill the individual and community claims as per process.
Rights for the rightful owners
Brinda Karat, The Hindu
In spite of its inadequacies, there can be little doubt that the Forest Rights Act (FRA) stands as a powerful instrument to protect the rights of tribal communities. It is a hindrance to corporate interests to their free loot and plunder of India’s mineral resources, its forests, its water. But the Narendra Modi government is systematically implementing its plan to weaken and dilute the Act in several ways.
A decade after Forest Rights Act, 80% tribal land claims rejected in several states: Bhum Adhikar Andolan
“Across the country”, the memorandum said, “Forest dwelling community continue to face eviction from forests, be it Gujars in Rajaji National Park, or tribals/other communities from Kaziranga National Park, or those form different reserved forest areas of Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat.” “There is a systematic attempt being made at nullifying the rights of the gram sabha in Himachal Pradesh and Chattisgarh”, the memorandum said, adding, in these two states governments have been issuing “guidelines in complete violation of the Act and your Ministry has remained mute witness to that.”
India’s forests valued at Rs 115 trillion, but tribals unlikely to get a share
Kumar Sambhav Shrivastava , Hindustan Times
India’s forests are worth as much as the combined market value of BSE-listed companies with a notional value of Rs 115 trillion but the money collected from diverting parts of this land for industries won’t go to communities that live in and are dependent on the jungles. The Union environment ministry accepted most recommendations of a 2013 expert panel that hiked the rates at which industrialists pay for diverting forest land but dropped a crucial clause mandating half that money be used to compensate tribals for the loss of jungles, documents reviewed by HT show.
REPORT: Promise and Performance: 10 Years of the Forest Rights Act in India (pdf)
Citizens’ Report, Community Forest Rights-Learning and Advocacy Process (CFRLA)